• Draft Book Chapters
  • Politics
  • Responses to The Republic
  • Responses to Democracy in America
  • In Brock’s Memory
    • Eulogy
    • Liberal Studies Award
    • Cowichan Graduate’s Award
    • Best Farm Practices
Skip to content

Brock Demus McLeod

On learning to govern ourselves.

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • Draft Book Chapters
  • Politics
  • Responses to The Republic
  • Responses to Democracy in America
  • In Brock’s Memory
    • Eulogy
    • Liberal Studies Award
    • Cowichan Graduate’s Award
    • Best Farm Practices

Author: Brock

Brock has been a teacher, a ski-bum and, following an internship at the B.C. Legislature, a trade policy advisor for the provincial government. From 2008 to 2015 he ran a small-scale organic vegetable farm with his wife, Heather, serving on the municipal agricultural advisory committee in later years. He has now turned his attention to research and writing, focussing on democratic renewal, improving governance and other political and philosophic interests, with the goal of writing a book on democratic reform. He lives on Vancouver Island with his wife and son where he enjoys good conversation, epic movies and old books.

Notes on reading the Republic: Part 5 (335e to 336a)

  I think we’ll need more to go on. Let’s see what happens next in the conversation. Cephalus, at any rate, is convinced by Socrates… Continue reading Notes on reading the Republic: Part 5 (335e to 336a)

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 11, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to The Republic
Tags business, justice, Plato's Republic, poets, The Matrix

Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Part 4 (335b to 335e)

At this, Socrates is compelled to ask: “is it the part of the just man to harm any human whatsoever?” Going through some examples with… Continue reading Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Part 4 (335b to 335e)

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 7, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to The Republic
Tags justice, Plato's Republic, virtue

Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Part 3 (331d to 335b)

  At this point, Cephalus’ son Polemarchus jumps back into the conversation, citing Simonides, the poet, as being in disagreement with Socrates’ suggestions. So Socrates… Continue reading Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Part 3 (331d to 335b)

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 4, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to The Republic
Tags justice, poets

First Draft of Chapter 5: Citizens’ Think Tank

The government has a voice, unions have a voice, business lobbies have a voice, environmental groups have a voice and think tanks have a voice,… Continue reading First Draft of Chapter 5: Citizens’ Think Tank

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 3, 2015March 24, 2016Author BY Brockin Categories Draft Book Chapters
Tags BC Citizens' Assembly, Citizen Think Tank, Gordon Gibson, juries, Oregon Citizen Initiative Review, think tanks

Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Post 2 (330c to 331d)

At this point, Socrates asks an interesting, if not impolite, question of Cephalus. Did he make his money or inherit it. Socrates explains that people… Continue reading Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Post 2 (330c to 331d)

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 2, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to The Republic
Tags inherit, justice, lying, money

Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Post 1 (327a to 300c)

The Republic is a story. Plato is not writing nonfiction but fiction.   The story is Socrates’ recollection of what happened the day before, much… Continue reading Notes on reading Plato’s Republic: Post 1 (327a to 300c)

PUBLISHED ON Posted on December 1, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to The Republic
Tags good life, Plato's Republic, poets

Day 19 (p. 332 to 363): Writers in the past saw a more important and permanent place for religion in society. How seriously should we (relatively less religious societies) take their analyses today?

Reading old books is interesting for many reasons, but one of my favourites is seeing how people viewed religion before atheism became mainstream. I remember… Continue reading Day 19 (p. 332 to 363): Writers in the past saw a more important and permanent place for religion in society. How seriously should we (relatively less religious societies) take their analyses today?

PUBLISHED ON Posted on November 16, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to Democracy in America
Tags Church and State, Democracy in America, Malthus, religion, Tocqueville

Day 18 (p. 313 to 331): Tocqueville makes the bold claim that the widespread use of juries in America is the reason for their political prudence. Is Judge Judy to the citizenry what Sesame Street is to children?

“I think that the practical intelligence and political good sense of the Americans are mainly attributable to the long use which they have made of… Continue reading Day 18 (p. 313 to 331): Tocqueville makes the bold claim that the widespread use of juries in America is the reason for their political prudence. Is Judge Judy to the citizenry what Sesame Street is to children?

PUBLISHED ON Posted on November 13, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to Democracy in America
Tags aristocracy, Democracy in America, Judge Judy, judges, juries, lawyers, Tocqueville

Gender Balance: Because it’s 2015.

“This reminds me of Plato’s ideas about women in the Republic,” said Norm. “How surprising,” quipped Ira wryly, “Norm brings it back to the Republic.”… Continue reading Gender Balance: Because it’s 2015.

PUBLISHED ON Posted on November 12, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Politics, Responses to The Republic
Tags Gender balance, human nature, national childcare, Plato's Republic, Trudeau

Day 17 (p. 294 to 312): Tocqueville argues that the majority does not have a right to vote for whatever laws it wants, but is limited by what is just. But who decides what is just and enforces it, if not the majority?

“…freedom of opinion does not exist in America (p. 307)”.   This is not the opening line of Tocqueville’s chapter entitled, ‘Unlimited Power of the… Continue reading Day 17 (p. 294 to 312): Tocqueville argues that the majority does not have a right to vote for whatever laws it wants, but is limited by what is just. But who decides what is just and enforces it, if not the majority?

PUBLISHED ON Posted on November 12, 2015March 3, 2017Author BY Brockin Categories Responses to Democracy in America
Tags Democracy in America, rights, Tocqueville

Posts navigation

Older posts
Newer posts
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Konmi by Pantip Treerattanapitak.